the great decay
righteousblasphemy:

sanityscraps:

Pretty sure the US ratio is lower, actually, but still heinously high.

Yeah, I think I remember it being something like 185:1, but as mentioned, that’s still fucking disgusting.

righteousblasphemy:

sanityscraps:

Pretty sure the US ratio is lower, actually, but still heinously high.

Yeah, I think I remember it being something like 185:1, but as mentioned, that’s still fucking disgusting.

reagan-was-a-horrible-president:

wilwheaton:

The goal of CISPA is to completely eliminate any sort of privacy online. It really is a Big Brother bill, and that isn’t hyperbole.
CISPA is orders of magnitude worse than SOPA/PIPA. We need to mobilize like we did before, and stop this.

————-
President Obama just threatened to veto CISPA if it makes its way through Congress.
Please click here to urge Obama to stand strong, and to let your lawmakers know that you support Obama’s veto threat.
CISPA is up for a vote this week. It would obliterate any semblance of online privacy in the United States, giving the government — including the military — broad new powers to spy on Internet users.
The White House’s letter expresses precisely the concerns that we’ve been highlighting over recent weeks — and is a result of the public pressure against CISPA:
The White House says that any cybersecurity legislation must preserve “Americans’ privacy, data confidentiality, and civil liberties and [recognize] the civilian nature of cyberspace.”
It says that, “The bill also lacks sufficient limitations on the sharing of personally identifiable information between private entities and does not contain adequate oversight or accountability measures necessary to ensure that the data is used only for appropriate purposes.”
And the letter goes on to assert that:
The American people expect their Government to enhance security without undermining their privacy and civil liberties.
Without clear legal protections and independent oversight, information sharing legislation will undermine the public’s trust in the Government as well as in the Internet by undermining fundamental privacy, confidentiality, civil liberties, and consumer protections.
This is an amazing development.  Let’s make the most of it:
Just click here to urge Obama to stand strong and to tell your lawmakers to oppose CISPA.
Thanks.
-Demand Progress
PS- We only have a few days left to kill CISPA.  Please tell your friends to get involved by forwarding this email or using these links:
 If you’re already on Facebook, click here to share with your friends.
If you’re already on Twitter, click here to tweet about the campaign: Tweet

reagan-was-a-horrible-president:

wilwheaton:

The goal of CISPA is to completely eliminate any sort of privacy online. It really is a Big Brother bill, and that isn’t hyperbole.

CISPA is orders of magnitude worse than SOPA/PIPA. We need to mobilize like we did before, and stop this.

————-

President Obama just threatened to veto CISPA if it makes its way through Congress.

Please click here to urge Obama to stand strong, and to let your lawmakers know that you support Obama’s veto threat.

CISPA is up for a vote this week. It would obliterate any semblance of online privacy in the United States, giving the government — including the military — broad new powers to spy on Internet users.

The White House’s letter expresses precisely the concerns that we’ve been highlighting over recent weeks — and is a result of the public pressure against CISPA:

  • The White House says that any cybersecurity legislation must preserve “Americans’ privacy, data confidentiality, and civil liberties and [recognize] the civilian nature of cyberspace.”
  • It says that, “The bill also lacks sufficient limitations on the sharing of personally identifiable information between private entities and does not contain adequate oversight or accountability measures necessary to ensure that the data is used only for appropriate purposes.”

And the letter goes on to assert that:

The American people expect their Government to enhance security without undermining their privacy and civil liberties.

Without clear legal protections and independent oversight, information sharing legislation will undermine the public’s trust in the Government as well as in the Internet by undermining fundamental privacy, confidentiality, civil liberties, and consumer protections.

This is an amazing development.  Let’s make the most of it:

Just click here to urge Obama to stand strong and to tell your lawmakers to oppose CISPA.

Thanks.

-Demand Progress

PS- We only have a few days left to kill CISPA.  Please tell your friends to get involved by forwarding this email or using these links:


If you’re already on Facebookclick here to share with your friends.

If you’re already on Twitter, click here to tweet about the campaign: Tweet


stfuconservatives:

timekiller-s:

liberalsarecool:

#truth

This is Beautiful (TM).

What was that sign about Fox News? “Rich people telling middle-class people to hate poor people”? Yyyup.

while distracting them from the realization that the middle class is rapidly disappearing

stfuconservatives:

timekiller-s:

liberalsarecool:

#truth

This is Beautiful (TM).

What was that sign about Fox News? “Rich people telling middle-class people to hate poor people”? Yyyup.

while distracting them from the realization that the middle class is rapidly disappearing

sofa-activist:

More proof that the whole world is just a fictitious, nightmare circus designed to either make me laugh or cry with madness.

sofa-activist:

More proof that the whole world is just a fictitious, nightmare circus designed to either make me laugh or cry with madness.

a-rebel-without-applause:

Nothings

how i view current society…

a-rebel-without-applause:

Nothings

how i view current society…

always reblog

blogvader:

Right, because over-spending on ‘defense’ equals ‘security’. (If what our military is doing in the world can be called ‘defense’ that is.)

blogvader:

Right, because over-spending on ‘defense’ equals ‘security’. (If what our military is doing in the world can be called ‘defense’ that is.)


adolescentalien:

advertising

adolescentalien:

advertising

thetart:

Lawmakers across the nation pursued a record number of reproductive health and rights-related provisions in 2011, a new report from the Guttmacher Institute finds, enacting 135 measures in 36 states — “an increase from the 89 enacted in 2010 and the 77 enacted in 2009.” Sixty-eight percent of the provisions — 92 in 24 states — restricted access to abortion services. The most high-profile state-level abortion debate of 2011 took place in Mississippi, where voters rejected the ballot initiative that would have legally defined a human embryo as a person “from the moment of fertilization,” setting the stage to ban all abortions and, potentially, most hormonal contraceptive methods in the state. Meanwhile, five states (AL, ID, IN, KS and OK) enacted provisions to ban abortion at or beyond 20 weeks’ gestation… Nine states also passed laws making it harder to avoid pregnancy in the first place. Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, Washington, Wisconsin, Montana, New Hampshire, and Texas reduced funding for family planning programs, with the Lone Star State reducing its reproductive health budget by as much as 66 percent. Indiana, Colorado, Ohio, North Carolina Texas and Wisconsin, meanwhile, “moved to disqualify or otherwise bar certain types of providers from the receipt of family planning funds” and “New Hampshire decided not to renew its contract through which the Planned Parenthood affiliate in the state received Title X funds.”

READ MORE »

think-progress:

1. The CIA is monitoring up to 5 million tweets per day.

2. Income inequality in America is worse than in Ancient Rome.

3. Twenty-three straight polls find Americans overwhelmingly want to raise taxes to pay down debt.

4. 68% of millionaires support…

curiositycounts:

A sobering visual guide to income distribution in the US, part of a larger infographic

curiositycounts:

A sobering visual guide to income distribution in the US, part of a larger infographic

honeyforthehomeless:

Kurt Vonnegut

honeyforthehomeless:

Kurt Vonnegut